For the past couple of weeks, the H-L editorial staff has been shorthanded again. When you’re down to as few people as we have now, it happens frequently. So, I’ve been filling in, writing editorials, editing copy, etc., while still trying to keep the columns going. But the blogging has suffered. Now, though, everyone is back on the job (for the next couple of weeks, at least). So, the ol’ Kurmudgeon can get back to being kurmudgeonly. We’ll start with a few short takes on recent events.
1. Rand Paul’s performance at the Fancy Farm Picnic left me unimpressed, but I can’t say the same about his Aug. 21 Internet “money bomb” event. Anyone raises more than $425,000 online in one day has proved he will have the money to be a player in the Republicans’ 2010 U.S. Senate primary. So, what if most of the contributions came from out of state? Out-of-state money spends the same as in-state money when it comes to financing campaigns. Secretary of State Trey Grayson remains the favorite, and I suspect he leads Paul by a wider margin than the recent SurveyUSA poll indicated. But even though Paul appeals more to libertarians than to mainstream Republicans, Grayson has to treat him as a serious threat, because the Bowling Green ophthalmologist won’t be going away anytime soon.
2. Some may see Democratic state Rep. Robin Webb’s narrow victory in Tuesday’s special election to fill the state Senate’s 18th District seat as a sign of public support for racetrack slots. I don’t. Even though expanded gambling was an issue in the race, Webb’s winning margin was too small to suggest any kind of mandate on any issue. But there is a gambling-related lesson that came out of this race, one that relates to Webb’s support for racetrack slots during the June special session of the General Assembly. The lesson is that a vote for expanded gambling is not sufficient in and of itself to get a lawmaker defeated the next time he or she faces voters, even in a district that has voted conservatively for the last 20 years. Maybe that will give a few legislators a bit more backbone the next time this issue comes up for a vote.
3. State Rep. Darryl Owens has pre-filed legislation that would take the reference to dueling out of the oath public officials swear to when they take office. I’m agin the bill. I think the provision requiring officials to swear they have not fought a duel, sent or accepted a challege to fight a duel or acted as a second in a duel adds a bit of character to the Kentucky oath of office. The state constitution has many outdated provisions that need to be addressed. But our dueling oath isn’t one of the important ones.

Larry Dale Keeling, a columnist for the Lexington Herald-Leader, has spent most of his 35-plus years in journalism reporting on or writing editorials and columns about Kentucky’s politics and political issues. He now brings his experience and expertise on those topics to the KyKurmudgeon blog.