KyKurmudgeon

Thursday’s column:

FRANKFORT — Slots Bill pulled up lame in mid-stretch of the special edition 2009 Legislative Derby. To that point, though, he ran a good race.

Good enough to keep Senate President David Williams playing defense throughout the trip — in the process causing some members of his caucus to cast votes that could come back to haunt a few of them.

Seven Republicans who voted to kneecap Ol’ Slots during Monday’s Senate Appropriations & Revenue Committee face re-election next year, assuming they choose to seek it. Sen. Bob Leeper, the Paducah Independent who caucuses with the Republicans and voted with them on this issue, also faces a 2010 race.

By voting against Slots Bill, six of the seven Republicans and Leeper deprived their districts of K-12 and post-secondary education projects approved by the House and scheduled to be funded with revenue generated by allowing Kentucky racetracks to compete slot machine for slot machine with “racinos” in other states.

The loss in Majority Floor Leader Dan Kelly’s district was minimal — a $1.87 million project in Mercer County. But other districts saw far more significant amounts of proposed spending disappear as a result of their senators’ no votes.

Leeper’s district, for instance, lost projects worth $9.7 million in Marshall County and $17 million in McCracken County.

Sen. Alice Forgy Kerr’s no vote helped deprive Fayette County of $7.4 million in school construction, the University of Kentucky of $136.6 million and the Bluegrass Community and Technical College of $1 million.

A&R Chairman Charlie Borders’ district took a big hit as a result of his vote: school construction worth $3.1 million in Bracken County, $18 million in Carter County, $19 million in Lewis County and $15.7 million in Robertson County. Maysville Community and Technical College lost a $5 million project as well.

Bullitt County, in Sen. Gary Tapp’s district, lost an $18.4 million project as a result of Slots Bill’s defeat. However, Tapp is not seeking re-election next year.

In the district of Sen. Ernie Harris, another no vote, Carroll County lost $2.2 million, Henry County lost $20 and Trimble County lost $10.5 million.

Sen. Brandon Smith also cast a no vote that helped keep his district from receiving school projects worth $4.1 million in Leslie County and $13.4 million in Perry County, plus a $15 million project for Hazard Community and Technical College.

Yes, all of these projects were “earmarks,” and I’m not fond of earmarks. In an ideal world, there would be no earmarks. All of Kentucky’s General Fund revenue would go into one big pool, and thoughtful decision-making would determine what the adequate funding levels of various needs and services should be.

But, pardon a couple of grammatical errors, the Kentucky General Assembly ain’t no ideal world — far from it. The political reality is that earmarks are the way things get done.

Even Williams, who ranted and railed about votes being bought for Slots Bill, has participated in decorating Christmas trees with project ornaments on multiple occasions in an attempt to entice lawmakers into passing legislation promoting his policy agenda.

A second part of that political reality is that lawmakers who vote down projects for their own districts sometimes have to answer for it, a truism proponents of expanded gambling must not forget.

House Speaker Greg Stumbo said this week this issue will not be resolved until the leadership of the Senate changes and the only way to change the Senate leadership is to change its membership.

But votes cast in June 2009 may be forgotten come November 2010.

So, proponents of expanded gambling need to help recruit credible candidates who can change the Senate membership. Then, they need to run Slots Bill right back at the Senate in early January and let the pressure from the horse industry and the education community back home in the Senate districts have plenty of time to build.

House members who supported Slots Bill have nothing to lose by doing so again. They’ve already got a pro-gambling vote on their record, a vote they can explain easily by saying they acted to save Kentucky’s signature industry and to improve school conditions for the state’s children.

But senators facing credible opposition in an election year who help kill projects in their own districts by voting against Slots Bill, either in committee or on the floor of the Senate, may have a tougher time convincing their constituents to send them back to Frankfort.

Who knows? Some of the senators facing the prospect of having to make that argument back home may even decide to help prove Stumbo wrong by rooting Slots Bill on to victory without a change in Senate leadership.